A HEALTH reform advocate on Sunday urged the government to fully restore the Philippine Health Insurance Corp.’s (PhilHealth) depleted reserves in the proposed 2026 national budget, following a Supreme Court (SC) ruling that ordered the return of P60 billion earlier transferred to the National Treasury.
“The government must now act decisively to correct the injustice by returning the P60 billion, with interest, to PhilHealth,” Anthony “Tony” C. Leachon said in a Facebook post. “Restitution is not merely compliance with the court — it is justice, stewardship and respect for the millions of Filipinos who depend on PhilHealth for survival.”
He called the unanimous ruling a “moral victory” but said the restitution must be complete, clearly earmarked and aligned with the Universal Health Care (UHC) law. He urged lawmakers to include all unreleased and diverted funds in the 2026 General Appropriations Act to protect the sustainability of health coverage.
The 2025 budget removed the entire P74.431-billion subsidy to PhilHealth that had been proposed in the National Expenditure Program. That amount was supposed to fund P53.134 billion in insurance premiums for indirect contributors, P21.17 billion for benefit upgrades under the UHC law and P121.17 million for community beneficiaries. PhilHealth kept these programs running by drawing from its reserves.
For 2026, the Executive Branch proposed a P53.262-billion subsidy taken mainly from sin tax collections. The House of Representatives later added P60 billion on President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr.’s instruction, raising the proposed allocation in the spending bill to P113.262 billion.
Mr. Leachon said even this higher figure is not enough to rebuild PhilHealth’s buffers after the 2025 cuts and the voided fund transfer.
“It should be from the Treasury, because the money was given to the Treasury from Philhealth,” Ephraim B. Cortez, president of the National Union of People’s Lawyers, said in a Viber message, referring to the transfer order from the high court.
“But if the Treasury does not have enough funds, since it is the end of the year. It can be allocated in the budget. But for them to do it, the Executive has to submit a supplemental budget,” he added.
In a decision penned by Associate Justice Amy C. Lazaro-Javier, the Supreme Court en banc declared as void and issued with grave abuse of discretion part of the 2024 budget law, Department of Finance Circular 003-2024 and the resulting P60-billion transfer from PhilHealth’s fund balance.
The court also permanently barred the transfer of the remaining P29.9 billion, which it had stopped through a temporary restraining order.
The court said the special provision was an unconstitutional rider — a clause not germane to the budget law’s purpose — and was ambiguous in its scope. It ruled that the transfer broke the UHC law and sin tax laws, which require PhilHealth to maintain reserves equal to two years of projected expenses and mandate that excise-tax earmarks go directly to health programs. These laws bar any diversion of reserve funds to the National Government.
Most justices agreed that the transfer weakened the legal protection for social health insurance and violated the constitutional guarantee of accessible healthcare.
“From taxes that all Filipinos pay — that means we are the ones to reimburse Philhealth, not those who stole the money of Philhealth,” retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio said in a Viber message.
Mr. Leachon estimated that PhilHealth’s corrected 2026 budget should reach about P278 billion. This amount, he said, must include three items: the P60 billion plus interest from the voided transfer, roughly P75 billion in unreleased sin tax revenues in 2025 and the P113 billion set in the 2026 proposal.
Reaching this level, he said, would restore reserves, support wider benefit packages and ease out-of-pocket expenses for members. “This is not a concession but a commitment. Healthcare is a sacred trust,” he added.
The Palace said it respects the ruling and that the Office of the Solicitor General would study it and take appropriate action, which could include a motion for reconsideration. Executive Secretary Ralph G. Recto said the government would follow the court order.
Mr. Marcos ordered the return of the P60 billion to PhilHealth in September, with plans to fund it through savings in other agencies such as the Department of Public Works and Highways.
In a separate statement, Cardinal Pablo Virgilio S. David, Bishop of Kalookan and president of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines, welcomed the ruling but questioned the plan to restore the amount using national budget appropriations.
“Thanks but no thanks… The nation has been robbed already, yet the people would still pay?” he asked, calling it a form of “moral double jeopardy.” He urged the government to recover the diverted funds directly from officials and private contractors involved in the transfer, including those linked to alleged flood control kickbacks, and to pursue criminal charges.
Meanwhile, Lanao del Sur Rep. Ziaur-Rahman Alonto Adiong said the House of Representatives has started steps to restore funds taken by the National Government from PhilHealth.
In a statement, he said the House version of the 2026 budget bill increased the allocations to the state health insurer.
“If there is a process for taking, there is also a process for returning, and that is through the national budget” Mr. Adiong, a vice-chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, said in Filipino. “The mechanism for returning the money is the same as the mechanism for getting it.”
Congressmen had reallocated P255 billion worth of Public Works funding originally meant for flood control projects to priority sectors like education, food and health when they approved the proposed P6.793-trillion national budget for next year.
Lawmakers increased PhilHealth’s funding to P113 billion from P53 billion originally proposed under the Executive’s National Expenditure Program, adding the P60 billion the government had taken last year.
The government’s move to tap what it described as PhilHealth’s idle funds has triggered a string of lawsuits in the SC, with plaintiffs arguing that the action was unconstitutional. Authorities had said a provision in the 2024 budget law authorized the transfer of P89.9 billion, though the full amount was not remitted after the legal challenges.
Then-Finance Secretary Ralph G. Recto told BusinessWorld shortly after Mr. Marcos’ statement that the government will restore the “excess funds” it took from PhilHealth via next year’s national budget.
“The House has done what the law requires,” Mr. Adiong said. “We followed the President’s directive, we followed the Constitution, and we returned the P60 billion through the national budget.” — Erika Mae P. Sinaking and Kenneth Christiane L. Basilio
